Shop By Brand

  • Corrosion Technologies
  • Dow Corning
  • LPS Laboratories
  • Castrol Industrial
  • Concorde Battery
  • Royco Lanxess
  • Gill Battery
  • Henkel Loctite
  • 3M Industrial
  • Artex Products
  • Lamar Technologies
  • Aeroshell
  • Lycoming
  • Parker Velcon
  • Tronair
  • Start Pac
  • H3R Aviation Inc
  • Cleveland Wheels & Brakes
  • Eastman™
  • Phillips 66
  • Exxon Mobil
  • ACR Artex
  • Celeste Industries
  • Nexeo Solutions
  • Purolator Advanced Filtration
  • Tempest - Aero Accessories
  • Aerosonic
  • Goodrich Deicer Systems
  • Loctite Henkel
  • Walchem
  • David Clark Co
  • Henkel Surface Treatments
  • Omron
  • Whelen Engineering
  • Cantel
  • Dukane Seacom Inc
  • Parker Hannifin Airborne
  • Sunshine Makers
  • Airpath Instrument Co
  • Switlik
  • Eastern Aero Marine
  • Fairchild
  • Lear Chemical
  • Hammonds Fuel Additives
  • LORD Corp
  • Sesame
  • Arkwin Industries Inc
  • Astronics DME Corporation
  • Dayton Granger Inc
  • Eni Oil Products
  • Kell-Strom Tool
  • Piper Aircraft
  • Timken Bearing
  • Bürkert
  • Crashkit Int. Corp.
  • Des-Case
  • ECHA
  • ECT Inc
  • Henkel Structural Adhesives
  • Huntsman Advanced Materials
  • L3 Harris
  • Magnaflux Corp
  • Seametrics
  • Zokman Products Inc
  • Brackett Aircraft Co Inc
  • Elantas Epoxylite®
  • Emcee Electronics, Inc.
  • Flamemaster Corporation
  • Gammon Hydrokit
  • Kannand
  • Lubriplate Lubricants Co
  • McFarlane Aviation
  • Saf Air Products Inc
  • Shell Aviation
  • Survival Products
  • Winslow Marine Life Rafts
  • 3 M Peltor
  • ACI-Lubes Co.
  • Amerex
  • American Tool Supply Company
  • Bio Cide International
  • Chelton Ltd.
  • Chevron
  • Clariant Corp.
  • Consolidated Ignition System
  • Copper State Petroleum
  • Flight Level 220
  • General Electric Lighting
  • Goodrich Wheel & Brake
  • Hartzell Engine Technologies LLC
  • Jet Stream Products
  • Lanxess
  • MarathonNorco Aerospace
  • MK Battery
  • Norwich Aero Products
  • View all Brands
  • Aircraft Deicing Systems

    Aircraft Ice Protection Systems

    Aircraft and engine ice protection systems are generally of two designs: either they remove ice after it has formed, or they prevent it from forming. The former type of system is referred to as a de-icing system and the latter as an anti-icing system.

    De-Icing Systems

    A de-icing system has two very attractive attributes. First, it can utilize a variety of means to transfer the energy used to remove the ice. This allows the consideration of mechanical (principally pneumatic), electrical and thermal methods. The second attribute is that it is energy efficient, requiring energy only periodically when ice is being removed, with some mechanical designs requiring relatively little energy overall. This is a significant consideration when designing ice protection for aircraft with limited excess power.

    The principal drawback to the de-icing system is that, by default, the aircraft will operate with ice accretions for the majority of the time in icing conditions. The only time it will be free of ice accretions will be the time during and immediately after the cycling of the de-ice system. This requires an understanding on the part of the designer and the pilot of what effects the ice accretions will have on aircraft performance, both prior to and during system operation.

    Anti-Icing Systems

    Anti-icing systems reverse this paradigm. Properly used, they prevent the formation of ice continuously, resulting in a clean wing with no aerodynamic penalties. An anti-icing system must have a means of continuously delivering energy or chemical flow to a surface in order to prevent the bonding of ice. The typical thermal anti-icing system does this at significant energy expense. The concept is not viable for aircraft that do not have the requisite excess energy available during all flight phases. An exception to this is the use of a chemical systems.

    Design Considerations

    It is not uncommon for a system that is designed as an anti-ice system to be used initially as a de-ice system. For example, the manufacturer may recommend that the wing thermal ice protection system be selected on when ice accretion has been detected, thus initially bypassing the anti-ice capability. Once selected on, the system is usually left on until icing conditions have been departed, allowing the anti-icing capability to function as intended.

    The selection of system design and the determination of operating procedures are based on the manufacturer’s understanding of the tolerance to ice accretion exhibited by the particular aerodynamic surface. For example, turbojet/turbofan engine inlets are almost universally protected by thermal anti-icing systems. These systems are nearly always used in an anti-icing manner, which is to say they are selected ON upon encountering visible moisture and crossing below a temperature threshold. This approach is due to the intolerance of the compressor inlet to ice ingestion; an imprecise de-ice cycle would lead to damage and/or loss of power.

    On the other hand, the same airplane may use a thermal anti-ice system for the protection of the wings, but the manufacturer may recommend that the system not be activated until ice accretion is noted on some representative surface. The judgment here is that the aerodynamic penalties associated with such “pre-activation” ice are acceptable and pose no safety hazard.

    Any time a design utilizes an ice detection system as a primary and automatic means of operating the ice protection system, the system becomes a de-ice system. An automatic means of activation will necessarily have a threshold for triggering both activation of the system and de-activation of the system. This is almost universally accomplished by means of an ice detector, which, as the name implies, must have some ice present to detect. Thus, the system is not activated until ice has accreted. Once the ice has been removed, the system automatically terminates, and awaits another ice detection trigger before cycling again. This is the de-ice cycle.